PDA

View Full Version : 'Free' Energy Technology



Dendritic Xylem
12-24-2014, 09:51 PM
Thread Introduction

This is a spin-off thread, continued from How To Implement Change (http://forum.alchemyforums.com/showthread.php?3622-How-To-Implement-Change&p=36302#post36302).

I think it's about time this topic had a thread of its own.

So, from now on, anything related to 'free energy', 'zero-point' energy, 'over-unity' and/or any other more sustainable and less 'enslaving' energy alternatives - can have a home here, on this thread.

It is my personal opinion that anything touching on this topic must somehow involve the same 'Hidden Hand' that is active in Alchemy, as I believe those two areas are in fact tightly interconnected.

In other words, I believe it goes beyond common electricity/mechanics/physics/etc. There are (IMO) 'other' factors at play, facts which those who discover are mostly hesitant to discuss...

For example, why have so few people succeeded in building an actually working Joe Cell? Or over-unity magnetic motors?

I would like us to at least try and explore the 'Hidden Hand' behind such 'hidden' energy technologies, that actually work.

What say you?

End of Introduction & back to Dendritic Xylem's original post...

Androgynus.
____________________



It would take a major world metamorphic event to bring the change needed.

Any ideas? ;)

Step 1: Build a relatively simple free energy device, like the Gabriel device or the permanent magnetic DC transformer of Lawrence Tseung.

Step 2: Write clear easy instructions on how to build the device.

Step 3: Print out many thousands of copies.

Step 4: Fly a small Cessna over major cities and rain down the instructions.

DISCLAIMER...Please don't do this. It is surely illegal.


---------------------------------------------------------------------

Ghislain
12-27-2014, 09:40 AM
DX have you made one of those Gabriel Devices?

Ghislain

--------------------------------------------------------

Dendritic Xylem
12-27-2014, 10:26 AM
DX have you made one of those Gabriel Devices?

No...but I wouldn't admit it even if I had.
There are some long threads on the different energy forums where members like mavendex seemed to have success in replication and then became silent about it soon after. Thane Heins was helping Klingelhoefer get the tech patented, then they got quiet also.

Check out the section about Lawrence Tseung's transformer in Patrick Kelly's free energy ebook. It is another solid state device which doesn't require very complex circuitry. I would play with different pulse frequencies though.

Ghislain
12-27-2014, 10:27 AM
DX you have sparked my curiosity...

I found this site Easy Build Free Energy Devices (http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=15&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CDcQFjAEOAo&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.free-energy-info.com%2FEasy-build.pdf&ei=tn-eVLbcM4XvasqXgpgG&usg=AFQjCNEvooit5fXeFypMsG44BcB0hIMgfQ)

I'll have to read more then give one a try; I'll let you know what I find.


I wouldn't admit it even if I had

That's exactly what I would do...shout it to the world...why wouldn't I?

Ghislain

Dendritic Xylem
12-27-2014, 10:38 AM
Good luck! I like that self powered water pump generator combo by James Hardy.

Nibiru
12-27-2014, 02:46 PM
I remember seeing a diagram a while back of a simple 'Tesla circuit', not sure which one. But I do remember thinking that if the circuit was reversed it should work as a method of attracting free energy rather than transmitting it.. If anyone knows what I'm referring to, I wouldn't mind being reminded.

In the meantime, these videos explaining devices that should be pretty simple to make, are interesting:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-yAkIF8LE8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-yAkIF8LE8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3t7W6jsjJLM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3t7W6jsjJLM


and here's a Christmas tree :)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HKjoDuYKAs8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HKjoDuYKAs8


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dpUT6YmLSMI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dpUT6YmLSMI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oN1_ixLg1ig

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oN1_ixLg1ig

Dendritic Xylem
12-28-2014, 02:14 AM
Hey Nibiru, maybe the circuit you saw was just a regular Tesla coil. You could maybe reverse it by hooking the secondary up to a ground and aerial then extracting current induced in the primary. Seems similar to the direction he was going with his "Apparatus for the Utilization of Radiant Energy" patent.

I think Androgynus is right about the hidden hand helping to guide both Alchemical and free energy related processes. Just look at Tesla's radiant energy apparatus...it looks to be combining the energy from Above and the energy from Below in order to do useful Work.

A common explanation for many of these "overunity" devices is that they are tapping into the "Zero-Point Energy Field" or the "Quantum Vacuum". Modern conventional scientists admit that this field or dimension exists all around us and that within this dimension there is phenomenal quantities of energy. There is enough energy in a cubic meter of empty space to boil away all the oceans on Earth. Some postulate that the energy is actually unlimited. So if these "free energy" devices are really utilizing this field, then it means the laws of conservation aren't being violated. The device is just taping into a source of energy that isn't accounted for in mainstream education.

From the revelations gleaned in the Spiritus Mundi thread, it seems that Our Subject is also gated into our realm from a more Universal dimension/field...perhaps analogous to the zero-point field.

Now imagine all of this stuff is true. There is a dimension with unlimited energy...and we can cheaply and easily tap into this energy with homemade machines. This technology may allow a relatively uneducated person with limited funds to build extremely dangerous weapons. Think portable explosives that don't need any rare or expensive nuclear materials and make the Hydrogen bomb look like a match stick. Planet killer type technology. It starts to make very good sense why the governments of the world would suppress it. I actually agree with the suppression of this technology from mainstream education as long as we humans remain as violent and self-destructive as we are. It is obvious that our species as a whole is too young and immature to use the tech responsibly. It wouldn't surprise me if ET's actually work with the major governments to keep out-of-line humans from leaving Earth with this tech.

It's like giving a firearm to a chimpanzee. Sure it will make the chimps life easier. Self-defense and hunting will no longer be problems for it. But the chimps will now be MUCH more dangerous to those who were previously in control.

http://www.joblo.com/newsimages1/dawn-apes-gunpoint.jpg


After several years of researching, it seems to me that as long as you act responsibly with the technology, you won't have to worry about getting in trouble. Keep it to yourself and don't try to spark too much public awareness. Also, don't try to do anything exotic with the technology. Just use it to make electricity for your house and electric vehicle. If you follow these guidelines it seems to placate the gov't shills.

Kiorionis
12-28-2014, 03:49 PM
Hey Nibiru :)


I remember seeing a diagram a while back of a simple 'Tesla circuit', not sure which one. But I do remember thinking that if the circuit was reversed it should work as a method of attracting free energy rather than transmitting it..

"Reversing the circuit" is a good start, but attracting 'free energy' only happens after the central fire ignites, according to what I understand in my limited experience with internal alchemy... So i would think any theoretical engine design should need a practical jump start.

But I don't know which diagram you're talking about.

theFool
12-28-2014, 11:32 PM
"Reversing the circuit" is a good start, but attracting 'free energy' only happens after the central fire ignites, according to what I understand in my limited experience with internal alchemy... Free energy .. I will agree with Kiorionis' intuitive statement. In the case of the Tesla radiant receiver notice the existence of the spark gap. Discharges behave strangely and some serious researchers (http://www.aetherometry.com/publications/direct/ISNE3.pdf) claim to extract 'free' energy out of them.
Solid state (using transistors or diodes) approaches to free energy usualy fail.

Looking online for amateur successful researchers will reveal that the majority of them uses digital voltmeters. Digital organs are very prone to false results. They think that they get more energy but of course they will never "close the loop".

The current opinion I have is that if an electrical free energy device has a hope to work, it should employ either gas discharge or vacuum tubes. Vacuum tubes could bring an interesting line of research into detecting aether (or orgone, etc ..) as they operate differently from transistors.
Another line of research could be on static electricity. There are still hidden secrets in its behaviour.

It seems to me that serious and dedicated work is required, unfortunately the DIY free energy devices schematics we find on youtube just don't work.

Dendritic Xylem
12-29-2014, 01:03 AM
I think Tesla said that static energy is converted into dynamic through the action of an arc discharge.

theFool
12-29-2014, 08:12 AM
In the meantime, these videos explaining devices that should be pretty simple to make, are interesting:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3t7W6jsjJLM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3t7W6jsjJLM

I have worked with this circuit. It is capturing radio waves, like the the radio receivers of the pre-war era. If radio broadcast stations are near to you, you can get some power. However, the power output is not scalable, there is nothing free. A researcher was claiming that if you stack two or more of these circuits together, you can take double or more power in the output. He was claiming something like 100W output out of 30 or more circuits stacked together (if someone interested I can find and post the link).
In my case, the output was always the same. One, two or four circuits like that stacked together produce the same output.

It seems that free energy recipes are like alchemy recipes, they require understanding the principles or having good luck!

Ghislain
12-29-2014, 09:16 AM
TF how did you stack the circuits, were they in series + to - or in parallel + to + and - to -.

If batteries are stacked in parallel you get a bigger capacitor same voltage, but in series you get smaller capacitor but higher voltage.

So if in series you can get more power but for a shorter period of time...I think :)

Two 12V batteries in parallel will give you 12V but more amp hours than a single 12V battery, whereas two 12V batteries in series will give you 24V with less amp hours.

Considering that the power to charge the plate is coming from the environment surrounding each plate then connected in series would make more sense to me.

Do you have a drawing of your experiment?

Ghislain

Edit: on cold mornings when my car wouldn't start I used to put two 12V batteries together in series to give me 24V just to start the car and get it warm, but you have to make sure everything else is switched off as this can damage 12V circuitry. This turned the engine over very fast. Do this at your own risk :)

theFool
12-29-2014, 12:02 PM
Do you have a drawing of your experiment?
Yes, you can find the schematic used here: http://www.free-energy-info.com/Chapter7.pdf , on page 8 under the title: "Jes Ascanius’ Version of Nikola Tesla’s Aerial System."

The proposed way to connect the circuit modules in this schematic is in parallel, but I have tried to connect them in a different way also (resembling series connection). The power was not doubled in my case. I had some differences in my setup compared to what is proposed (eg. I had uninsulated wire connecting to the antenna plate) but in general I tried to follow the schematics as much as I could (thick copper wire, germanium diodes). Who knows, maybe some better attention to detail in a future experiment will bring positive results. But I still cannot understand the principle of operation.

In order to start understanding what atmospheric electricity is, I would propose to replicate this experiment: (atmospheric motor)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=do4IO_U3B5o
This is one of the easiest experiments to capture the true atmospheric electricity (not radio waves). After being successful to this, one could try to extract more energy from his antenna by spark gap, vacuum tubes or other methods. (http://www.rexresearch.com/plauson/plauson.htm)

Eventually the antenna will not need to be so big and high up the air since the experimenter will have understood the theory of how to extract amplified power, thus making the antenna much smaller. (like this here: http://www.rexresearch.com/guillot/guillot.htm)


Edit: on cold mornings when my car wouldn't start I used to put two 12V batteries together in series to give me 24V just to start the car and get it warm, but you have to make sure everything else is switched off as this can damage 12V circuitry. This turned the engine over very fast. Do this at your own risk Cool idea :D



If batteries are stacked in parallel you get a bigger capacitor same voltage, but in series you get smaller capacitor but higher voltage.
So if in series you can get more power but for a shorter period of time...I think
This is true. Double voltage on the same load, means double current drawn and the power drawn from the battery is higher (4 times). Two batteries connected in parallel on the same load will give the same power as one, but for longer time. In series, they will be depleted much quicker.



Two 12V batteries in parallel will give you 12V but more amp hours than a single 12V battery, whereas two 12V batteries in series will give you 24V with less amp hours. Yes. One can control the rate of discharge by adjusting the load also. But in the end, the sum of the output energy will always be the same, no matter if you connect series, parallel or play with the load.

Ghislain
12-29-2014, 02:31 PM
But in the end, the sum of the output energy will always be the same, no matter if you connect series, parallel or play with the load.

Yes but with batteries we are talking of a finite store of energy whereas with the system mentioned we are taking it from the environment, this is what made me think that a series connection may be better.

The output power is better in series isn't it?

Edit: I live in a second floor apartment so banging a pole into the ground for an earth isn't really an option. Could I use the copper water pipes as an earth?

Ghislain

theFool
12-29-2014, 07:57 PM
The output power is better in series isn't it?
For a given load (fixed resistor) more voltage means more power drawn from the source. But this means nothing, you can draw the same power out of parallel connected batteries if you adjust the load (make it to have smaller resistance)
Generally speaking, series connection means double voltage and same current (amperes) ability while parallel connection means same voltage but double current output ability. However, in order to "draw" this double current you have to adjust your load (lower the resistance). There is no preference between series or parallel connection when it comes to output power, output power will always be the same (given that you adjust the load to its optimum value).

In the case of the "free energy receiver" module, series connection will give higher voltage output (but same current), but parallel connection will charge the output capacitor quicker (more current output, but same voltage). In the end, power output will be the same.
Imagine having two water pumps. Pressure of water is the voltage, and the flow of water (mass per second) is the current. No matter how you connect them (series - parallel), it will take the same time to fill your bucket with water.



Edit: I live in a second floor apartment so banging a pole into the ground for an earth isn't really an option. Could I use the copper water pipes as an earth?

From an electrical viewpoint, yes. In my case I used the electrical ground of the house. But this free energy device probably is not exactly electrical. It captures an "electrical fluid" that requires thick wires to pass through and possibly fresh ground. In any case, even if you manage to get a small power output, you can perform experiments on it to see if it is attributed to radio emmisions or something different. If the latter is true one can build a proper ground or higher antenna later.

Some useful links:

http://spiritualsprings.org/ss-1118.htm

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/10947-jes-ascanius-radiant-collector.html

In the above forum (at the first page) you can find a response from the inventor of the stackable circuits, Jes Ascanius. He says that he discovered it by "thinking ultra logically through Hermetic rules / Axioms" :cool: