Patrons of the Sacred Art

OPEN TO REGISTER: Click HERE if you want to join Alchemy Forums!

+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 64

Thread: The Stone Finally Solved?

  1. #31
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    London
    Posts
    2,652
    Hi Aleilius

    In your post above you said
    Of course, with this being said, they later "determined" that it was a fluke.
    Could you elaborate on how they determined it was a fluke?

    Thanks

    Ghislain

  2. #32
    Hi Ghislain, I believe they "determined" that it was due to bacteria. I'd have to go back and watch the show to give you more detail on it. I watched it a few years ago. Of course, at that time I was very skeptical, and was thinking "How can a pyramid do this? That's nonsense! There must be some other explanation." I believe they mentioned the results were spooky. Something like that.

    I do think there is really something very out of the ordinary happening here.

    I would like to paste a link to an interview about hyperdimensional physics. It can be found here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXy_8...eature=related. Start at 7:30, and go to 8:00. Richard C. Hoagland mentions something VERY interesting which I had not known about when I was working on my extradimensional theory of the origin of the universal spirit/philosophical mercury, but I must say, what he mentions does back up my theory to a great degree.

  3. #33
    I believe that a Merkaba Star will be better at manifesting the Universal Spirit/Philosophical Mercury than a tetrahedron/pyramid. It will manifest in the center. Please refer to the image below:

    Last edited by Aleilius; 06-02-2010 at 09:22 AM.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    304
    According to Buckminster Fuller’s book/system Synergetics…

    http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synerg...nergetics.html

    http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/toc/toc.html

    http://www.angelfire.com/mt/marksomers/40.html

    http://www.angelfire.com/mt/marksomers/45a.html

    … the star tetrahedron bears a complimentary relation to the vector equilibrium.

    http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synerg...igs/f1301.html

    http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synerg...igs/f5406.html

    Here are some passages relating/contrasting the two:

    310.01 Our modern concept of Universe is as a comprehensive system of energy processes. Universe is a nonsimultaneously potential vector equilibrium. The integrity of Universe is implicit in the external finiteness of the entirely embracing circumferential set of the integrated vectors of the vector equilibrium that always enclose the otherwise divisive, disintegrative, entirely embraced internal radial set of omnidirectional vectors. Universe is tensional integrity.

    310.02 The star tetrahedron’s entropy may be the basis of irreversible radiation, whereas the syntropic vector equilibrium's reversibility__inwardly, outwardly__is the basis for the gravitationally maintained integrity of Universe. The omnidirectional, omniwave, propagating pulsivity of Universe realizations is eternally potential and implicit in the vector equilibrium.

    351.00 Negative Universe is the complementary but invisible Universe.

    352.00 Those subsequently isolated elements beyond the 92 prime chemical elements constitute superatomics. They are the non-self-regenerative chemical elements of negative Universe.

    353.00 The star tetrahedron may explain the whole negative phase of energetic Universe.

    637.00 Star Tetrahedron

    637.01 The name of this dynamic vector-equilibrium complementary tetrahedron is the star tetrahedron. The star tetrahedron is one in which the vectors are no longer equilibrious and no longer omnidirectionally and regeneratively extensible. This star tetrahedron name was given to it by Leonardo da Vinci.

    637.02 The star tetrahedron consists of five equal tetrahedra, four external and one internal. Because its external edges are not 180-degree angles, it has 18__instead of six__equi-vector external edges: 12 outwardly extended and six inwardly valleyed; ergo, a total of 18. It is a compound structure. Four of its five tetrahedra, which are nonoutwardly regenerative in unit-length vectors, ergo, non-allspace-filling, are in direct correspondence with the five four-ball tetrahedra which do close-pack to form a large, regular, three- frequency tetrahedron of four-ball edges, having one tetrahedral four-ball group at the center rather than an octahedral group as is the case with planar and linear topological phenomena. This is not really contradictory because the space inside the four-ball tetrahedron is always a small concave octahedron, wherefore, an octahedron is really at the center, though not an octahedron of six balls as at the center of a four, four-ball tetrahedral "pyramid."

    638.01 The star tetrahedron is a structure__but it is a compound structure. The fifth tetrahedron, which is the original one, and only nuclear one accommodates the pulsations of the outer four. Its outward pulsings are broadcast, and its inward pulsings are repulsive__that is why it is a star. The four three-way__12 in total__external pulsations are unrestrained, and the internal pulsations are compressionally repulsed. Leonardo called it the star tetrahedron, not because it has points, but because he sensed intuitively that it gives off radiation like a star. The star tetrahedron is an impulsive-expulsive transceiver whose four, 12-faceted, exterior triangles can either (a) feed in cosmic energy receipts which spontaneously articulate one or another of the 15 interpairings of the six A, B, C, D, interior tetrahedron's couplings, or (b) transmit through one of the external tetrahedra whose respective three faces each must be refractively pulsated once more to beam or broadcast the 45 possible AA, AF, FF messages.

    638.02 There is a syntropic pulsation receptivity and an outward pulsation in dynamic symmetry of the star tetrahedron. As an energy radiator, it is entropic. It does not regenerate itself internally, i.e., gravitationally, as does the isotropic vector matrix's vector equilibrium. The star tetrahedron's entropy may be the basis of irreversible radiation, whereas the syntropic vector equilibrium's reversibility__inwardly-outwardly__is the basis for the gravitationally maintained integrity of Universe. The vector equilibrium produces conservation of omnidynamic Universe despite many entropic local energy dissipations of star tetrahedra. The star tetrahedron is in balance with the vector equilibrium__pumpable, irreversible, like the electron in behavior. It has the capability of self-positionability by converting its energy receipts to unique refraction sequences, which could change output actions to other dynamic, distances-keeping orbits, in respect to the__also only remotely existent and operating__icosahedron, and its 15 unique, great-circle self-dichotomizing; which icosahedra can only associate with other icosahedra in either linear-beam export or octahedral orbital hover-arounds in respect to any vector equilibrium nuclear group. (See Sec. 1052.)

    639.01 The star tetrahedron is nonreversible. It can only propagate outwardly. (The vector equilibrium can keep on reproducing itself inwardly or outwardly, gravitationally.) The star tetrahedron's four external tetrahedra cannot regenerate themselves; but they are external-energy-receptive, whether that energy be tensive or pressive. The star tetrahedron consists only of A Modules; it has no B Modules. The star tetrahedron may explain a whole new phase of energetic Universe such as, for instance, Negative Universe.

    639.02 The vector equilibrium's closest-packed sphere shell builds outwardly to produce successively the neutron and proton counts of the 92 regenerative chemical elements. The star tetrahedron may build negatives for the post-uraniums. The star tetrahedron's six potential geodesic interconnectors of the star tetrahedron's outermost points are out of vector-length frequency-phase and generate different frequencies each time they regenerate; they expand in size due to the self-bulging effects of the 15 energy message pairings of the central tetrahedron. Because their successive new edges are noncongruent with the edges of the original tetrahedron, the new edge will never be equal to or rational with the original edge. Though they produce a smooth-curve, ascending progression, they will always be shorter__but only a very little bit shorter__than twice the length of the original edge vectors. Perhaps this shortness may equate with the shortening of radial vectors in the transition from the vector equilibrium's diameter to the icosahedron's diameter. (See Sec. 460, Symmetrical Contraction of Vector Equilibrium.) This is at least a contraction of similar magnitude, and mathematical analyses may show that it is indeed the size of the icosahedron's diameter. The new edge of the star tetrahedron may be the same as the reduced radius of the icosahedron. If it is, the star tetrahedron could be the positron, as the icosahedron seems to be the electron. These relationships should be experimentally and trigonometrically explored, as should all the energy-experience inferences of synergetics. The identifications become ever more tantalizingly close.

    And the genesa-crystal form is related to the vector equilibrium:

    http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synerg...gs/f5011b.html

    http://www.genesa.org/

    "Genesa Crystals mirror the cellular pattern of an embryonic living organism after the third cell division. This eight-cell stage of cell development is identical in all life forms."

    "This archetypal sacred geometry pattern is technically called a cuboctahedron, an Archimedean Solid, that uniquely contains within it all of the 5 Platonic Solids (tetrahedron, cube, octahedron, icosahedron, and dodecahedron), shapes that are the building blocks for all organic life. These were seen as static and separate from one another, until in 1946 Buckminster Fuller , a visionary architect and designer of the geodesic dome, used his energetic - synergetic geometry to show that they are, in fact, related to each other as phases of a mutual transformational process vibrating within the shape of the cuboctahedron. He said that "...it is the only referential pattern of conceptual relationships at which nature never pauses". It is considered by some to be his most important discovery."

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuboctahedron

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derald_Langham#Genesa

    "[Langham] also promoted the use of his Genesa Crystals, or eight point patterns that reflect the cells of an embryonic organism. According to Dr. Langham, these crystals, now sold through many new age and holistic jewelers, had "the full potential for infinite love, for infinite wisdom, for infinite form, for infinite energy, for infinite power, for the Soul, for eternal time, for infinite velocity, for infinite faith. It has all your goals, your desires, your motivations – even life itself."

    Langham believed that the crystal, known as an Archimedean solid or a cuboctahedron, held infinite potential for people to bond with the energies in their lives. One could meditate in a larger Genesa crystal standing in a garden to help tune into the biofields of the surrounding plants."

    http://www.selfhealthandawarenesscen...a_crystals.htm

    http://www.young-design.com/makeown.html

    http://mesacreativearts.com/html/heliospheres.html

    There are a numerous additional references to “star-tetrahedron” and (especially) “vector equilibrium” (an important, dynamic geometrical form for Fuller) in Synergetics. It is easy to do a keyword search of the book at http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synerg...nergetics.html ... and I cannot do justice here to the place the vector equilibrium holds in Fuller's system.

    Given what I have read thus far, I would favor the vector-equilibrium/genesa-crystal over the star tetrahedron.

    More links:

    http://www.angelfire.com/mt/marksomers/90.html

    http://www.angelfire.com/mt/marksomers/92.html

    http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synerg...igs/f6008.html

    http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synerg...gs/f7002a.html
    Attached Images
    Last edited by Albion; 06-03-2010 at 08:43 PM.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    304
    I’m getting the sense that the mass and molecular configurations inherent in stone greatly contribute to the energetic gravitas of a pyramid. I don’t see how a mere frame or shell pyramid can compare.

    So I’ve decided to make a Giza-proportioned cast out of plywood which I will invert and fill with a concrete mix consisting of:

    - Cement
    - Magnetite sand
    - Muscovite Mica powder
    - Quartz sand

    Its base side length will be 2-feet (or more), it will have a removable top and an inner chamber, and will be placed outdoors.

    In the chamber will be placed a jar with a colloidal or monatomic solution of Au (and some other ingredients) for 40 days.

    I’ll report on the results.

    Note: I realize that the end-product will not be “The Philosopher’s Stone Solved.” Could be spiritually nutritious though…

    Magnetite:

    http://ormuswater.vpinf.com/index.html

    Mica:

    FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS / Chapter 23 / The Sun and the Moon and the Way of the Dead / Graham Hancock

    "Some archaeological discoveries are heralded with much fanfare; others, for various reasons, are not. Among this latter category must be included the thick and extensive layer of sheet mica found sandwiched between two of the upper levels of the Teotihuacan Pyramid of the Sun when it was being probed for restoration in 1906. The lack of interest which greeted this discovery, and the absence of any follow-up studies to determine its possible function is quite understandable because the mica, which had a considerable commercial value, was removed and sold as soon as it had been excavated. The culprit was apparently Leopoldo Bartres, who had been commissioned to restore the time-worn pyramid by the Mexican government.

    There has also been a much more recent discovery of mica at Teotihuacan (in the ‘Mica Temple’) and this too has passed almost without notice. Here the reason is harder to explain because there has been no looting and the mica remains on site. One of a group of buildings, the Mica Temple is situated around a patio about 1000 feet south of the west face of the Pyramid of the Sun. Directly under a floor paved with heavy rock slabs, archaeologists financed by the Viking Foundation excavated two massive sheets of mica which had been carefully and purposively installed at some extremely remote date by a people who must have been skilled in cutting and handling this material. The sheets are ninety feet square and form two layers, one laid directly on top of the other.

    Mica is not a uniform substance but contains trace elements of different metals depending on the kind of rock formation in which it is found. Typically these metals include potassium and aluminum and also, in varying quantities, ferrous and ferric iron, magnesium, lithium, manganese and titanium. The trace elements in Teotihuacan’s Mica Temple indicate that the underfloor sheets belong to a type which occurs only in Brazil, some 2000 miles away. Clearly, therefore, the builders of the Temple must have had a specific need for this particular kind of mica and were prepared to go to considerable lengths to obtain it, otherwise they could have used the locally available variety more cheaply and simply.

    Mica does not leap to mind as an obvious general-purpose flooring material. Its use to form layers underneath a floor, and thus completely out of sight, seems especially bizarre when we remember that no other ancient structure in the Americas, or anywhere else in the world, has been found to contain a feature like this.

    It is frustrating that we will never be able to establish the exact position, let alone the purpose, of the large sheet that Bartres excavated and removed from the Pyramid of the Sun in 1906. The two intact layers in the Mica Temple, on the other hand, resting as they do in a place where they had no decorative function, look as though they were designed to do a particular job. Let us note in passing that mica possesses characteristics which suit it especially well for a range of technological applications. In modern industry, it is used in the construction of capacitors and is valued as a thermal and electric insulator. It is also opaque to fast neutrons and can act as a moderator in nuclear reactions."
    Last edited by Albion; 06-02-2010 at 05:54 PM.

  6. #36
    Hi Albion, yes, you might be right about stone. I do not know for sure. A few articles that I have read on this phenomena mentioned that they used conductive rods (copper, iron, etc - coat hangers).

    I have constructed a pyramid frame from coat hangers. Each rod is 18" in length. They are soldered together. The whole frame is conductive. Inside of this, at the appropriate location, I will place a small amount of red gold that I made a few months ago. I will keep track of any color changes that happens during this time. Also, I will keep track of any other anomalies that occur (bubbling forming, floating precipitate, etc).

    Here are both of the images:




  7. #37
    I would also like to mention that many believe that the nucleus of an atom displays this same strange hyperdimensional geometry phenomena. As once commonly thought, the nucleus of an atom is not just a jumbled ball of neutrons & protons, but rather a highly defined geometrical arrangement.

    I cite these links:

    http://home.earthlink.net/~kdthrge/sub1.htm
    http://www.stringtheory.com/mensur.htm
    http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/p...php?f=8&t=1083
    http://www.unclear2nuclear.com/index.php
    http://www.nature.com/emboj/journal/...j2009375a.html
    http://www.quantum-geometry.com/background.asp
    Last edited by Aleilius; 06-03-2010 at 02:31 AM.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    304
    Aleilius wrote: Hi Albion, yes, you might be right about stone. I do not know for sure. A few articles that I have read on this phenomena mentioned that they used conductive rods (copper, iron, etc - coat hangers).

    I have constructed a pyramid frame from coat hangers. Each rod is 18" in length. They are soldered together. The whole frame is conductive. Inside of this, at the appropriate location, I will place a small amount of red gold that I made a few months ago. I will keep track of any color changes that happens during this time. Also, I will keep track of any other anomalies that occur (bubbling forming, floating precipitate, etc).


    I just finished "Shape Power" wherein the author restates Flanagan's claim that a frame [as long as it isn't aluminum] is just as, or even more, effective than a complete shell - which is improved with holes in the sides. But I am not sure if they were ever comparing a frame to a nearly solid stone pyramid.

    I look forward to reading your results.
    __________________________________________

    Another interesting point in that book is that a sphere is the one shape that most concentrates energies to its geometric center - and am reminded of some of LR's posts.
    Last edited by Albion; 06-03-2010 at 03:03 AM.

  9. #39
    Quote Originally Posted by Albion View Post
    I just finished "Shape Power" wherein the author restates Flanagan's claim that a frame [as long as it isn't aluminum] is just as, or even more, effective than a complete shell - which is improved with holes in the sides. But I am not sure if they were ever comparing a frame to a nearly solid stone pyramid.

    I look forward to reading your results.
    Hi Albion, how long have you been researching this subject? I'm really curious. It sounds like you know a lot on the subject.

    I'm curious about the frame. Do you know why Flanagan claimed that aluminum would not work? I have always heard strange things about aluminum. For instance, I believe in a certain course the PON mentioned that aluminum inhibits nuclear transmutations, and that one should never use aluminum in the work for this reason. I believe I read somewhere else that it is a "dead" metal. I really do not know for sure. I've also heard the opposite claims.

    I'm interested in the results too. After setting all this up I had to stop, and ask myself "is this really possible?" It looks kind of silly. I had to laugh! It just seems so out there. If this is real then it's simply a matter of waiting - the results should manifest per se (as it's programmed into the laws of the universe) - no user interaction required.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    1,102
    Well to be fair, there is always user interaction, either by thought, or even pressence, even "no action" is a type of action - so use the best of actions.


    ~Seth-Ra
    One fatal tree there stands of knowledge called, forbidden them to taste. Knowledge forbidden? Suspicious. Reasonless. And why should their Lord envy them that? Can it be sin to know? Can it be death? And do they stand by ignorance, is that their happy state, the proof of their obedience and their faith?

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts