
Originally Posted by
JDP
You assume too much. One of your big problems. I rarely make assumptions. Anyone can tell from my posts how much I actually know about these matters. Even you yourself have benefited from my posts before. I need to prove nothing regarding this subject, my posts so far speak for themselves.
As for when will I instruct the world about the "chymical" methods that do work and give some gold and silver and which ones do not work and were merely phony baloney invented to deceive and frustrate most seekers after the truth: like I said many times before, this is a vast and complex subject undergoing investigation. There is still much to do and establish beyond what already has been discovered and established. And the only way to do this is through EMPIRICAL TRIAL AND ERROR, which takes both time and money to do. That is the real reason why relatively few people have managed to discover the reality of the subject. There are no "little angels with harps" floating around fluffy clouds and coming down from any hypothetical (and unproven) "heaven" ready to conveniently deliver any information regarding this subject to some mysterious select few, out of the whim & fancy of some hypothetical (and also unproven) "God" somewhere out there. Welcome to cold, hard reality, folks. You want to get to the truth regarding transmutation? You have to WORK HARD for it. There is no other way to attain it. No "shortcuts". No special exceptions. In fact, when I do publish my findings that will in fact be the only "shortcut" to ever exist on this subject, as the empirical investigator will be able to skip a lot of the phony baloney and concentrate on things that actually give positive results. This should already have been done back in the 18th century, when some very experienced "chymists" had already spent a great deal of their time and fortunes investigating this subject and had found the empirical reality of the subject for themselves, but they enviously kept the results of their systematic empirical process of elimination to themselves and never published them. And anyone who has investigated the subject on their own knows very well why they decided to do this: the sacrifice they had to make to get to the truth was so great that when they found it it was just not worth releasing it to the public for "free". Too much time and money invested on it to just give it away like that. But sooner or later this vicious circle (i.e. malicious chymist occasionally writes truths but at the same time invents shit-loads of lies and phony processes to make getting at the said truths very hard, but then more honest chymist comes forth and puts said shit-load of processes to the test and finds out that the large majority of them are total bullshit that does not deliver what it promises, but he has spent so much time and money in determining this that he keeps the results of his investigation quiet and lets the said malicious chymist get away with murder, and this goes on and on...) will have to be broken and someone has to once and for all clear the path to publicly, without any meddling deception, establish the empirical reality of the matter. And that person will likely be yours truly. Only the future will tell.
Bookmarks