Patrons of the Sacred Art

OPEN TO REGISTER: Click HERE if you want to join Alchemy Forums!

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: Indigenous people

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    In the moment...
    Posts
    8,029
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Dragon's Tail View Post
    ...my favorite rig might shock you... was Chevron...
    Chevron is rotten up and down, out and in... sure they take care of their "white culture homeboys"... sorry, but Chevron is a fucking disgusting company, and they all deserve to go to jail.

    Check out this website: www.chevrontoxico.com



    Also Hillary can suck my dick... if I was into beastiality that is...

    Last edited by Awani; 2 Weeks Ago at 10:40 PM.
    Don’t let the delusion of reality confuse you regarding the reality of the illusion.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    300
    Blog Entries
    6
    American Scythian's. A lost culture.

    John Smith, 131 years old.

    https://imgur.com/a/C1EHP

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    1,451
    Sounds like a nice trip & experience.

    I don't have the mentality of "They are wiser" or "They live better"... I simply think that our culture is important and it is sad that so many cultures were destroyed (and others are currently being destroyed), because it is similar to the destruction of the library of Alexandria; a knowledge that gets lost forever and can't be recovered.

    Other than that... you obviously wrote with admiration and in a tender way, but remember that "indigenous", "indian", etc can be very derogative terms when they are used to describe aboriginal cultures (unless you are actually talking about India).
    I saw that in the USA the term is actually used by the aboriginals to describe themselves: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Indian_Movement ... so maybe it is an acceptable term in the USA?
    ... but in Latin America, the term is considered very derogative... and "aboriginal" is the term that is used.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    In the moment...
    Posts
    8,029
    Blog Entries
    2
    Indigenous is the only politically correct term and its Spanish equivalent. Now there might be individual opinion, but that is the correct term. Although if you want to be really correct you call them by their tribe/people name. Indigenous in the USA call themselves Indian, although I would advice white people to call them either indigenous or by their people name. Aboriginal is the term used for the indigenous in Australia.

    Our culture is not that important.

    Don’t let the delusion of reality confuse you regarding the reality of the illusion.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    1,451
    Quote Originally Posted by Awani View Post
    Indigenous is the only politically correct term and its Spanish equivalent. Now there might be individual opinion, but that is the correct term. Although if you want to be really correct you call them by their tribe/people name. Indigenous in the USA call themselves Indian, although I would advice white people to call them either indigenous or by their people name. Aboriginal is the term used for the indigenous in Australia.

    Our culture is not that important.
    I feel like I am derailing the thread... my intention is not to correct you, but to explain you.
    I live in Latin america (as you know)... the term "Indians" (indios) is in Latin America considered EXTREMELY derogative and "aboriginals" (aborígenes) is used.
    "Native" (nativos) is not used in Latin America as to talk about the aboriginals because it has a different meaning (in example, in Spanish if you talk about the Brazilian Natives, it simply means everyone who was born in Brazil... not the aborigines of Brazil).

    So do not take it as a "correction", but as an explanation.

    I saw that in the USA the term "indians" is acceptable, in Latin America it sounds similar to talking about african-descendants by calling them "fucking niggers", it is really considered very very very derogative. Even the people who is a bit racist would not use the term "indians" in Latin America unless they want to get completely out of the "racist closet".

    So it is not a "correction", but an explanation... because I know that one of your passions is the Latin American aboriginal cultures and you may end up saying something very offensive by a "cultural mistake" (which is simply cause because you don't live in this area and you obviously don't know some silly things about this place,just like I do not know some etiquette rules of the northern countries of Europe... because I do not live there).

    When I said that our culture is important... I meant the whole of our culture or the whole culture of mankind.... and I know that you agree with me there. You are an "anthropologist" in your own special way.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    In the moment...
    Posts
    8,029
    Blog Entries
    2
    I do not know about that word in your city, but in Peru and Ecuador and Colombia the term is indigenous i.e. "indigena". It is not "indian" and aboriginal is the same word as indigenous, but the latter is most often used for those in Australia. The indigenous call themselves indigenous.

    Maybe Argentina is different, but the whole Amazon and in the rest of the world the term is indigenous and its translated equivelant.

    Indigenous is not an offensive word. Indian might be. Although most indigenous define themselves as Achuar, Kichwa, Shipibo, Apache etc.

    I agree with you on the word "indian", but the word "indigenous" is not wrong. I never used the term "indian".

    I object because you wrote that "indigenous" is derogatory. It is not.

    Don’t let the delusion of reality confuse you regarding the reality of the illusion.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    1,773
    Quote Originally Posted by Awani View Post
    I do not know about that word in your city, but in Peru and Ecuador and Colombia the term is indigenous i.e. "indigena". It is not "indian" and aboriginal is the same word as indigenous, but the latter is most often used for those in Australia. The indigenous call themselves indigenous.

    Maybe Argentina is different, but the whole Amazon and in the rest of the world the term is indigenous and its translated equivelant.

    Indigenous is not an offensive word. Indian might be. Although most indigenous define themselves as Achuar, Kichwa, Shipibo, Apache etc.

    I agree with you on the word "indian", but the word "indigenous" is not wrong. I never used the term "indian".

    I object because you wrote that "indigenous" is derogatory. It is not.

    But even the term "Indian" should not be considered "derogatory", unless one thinks that being confused for people from India is "offensive". At worst, the term "Indian" for indigenous peoples of the New World should be considered "silly" and "inaccurate", as it comes from a historical case of mistaken identity. Early European explorers had severely underestimated the size of the world and thought they had reached India by sailing west. Little did they suspect that in between there actually was a huge landmass inhabited by other peoples that had nothing to do with India and its inhabitants.

+ Reply to Thread

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts