Thank you Merovee for your response, I have enjoyed reading it and I do apologise for taking so long to reply.
Yes Merovee, I believe it was from these analogies/allegories (from most of the Old Masters) that the majority of the students of this Art did take it literally and unfortunately for them, interpret it as being the correct processes and materials to use.In any case, one can say that Paracelsus laid the foundation for today's chemistry with his spagyric.
However, he was not the only one, at about the same time there was also an adept who called himself Basilius Valentinus and who developed and recorded some spagyric procedures, but he only became known later.
His spagyric consisted of two parts, the essential part concerns alchemy, and so the majority of his instructions must be understood as analogies for alchemical or philosophical work, they should in no case be taken literally, but must be broken down philosophically before one set to work.
As you have written "the spagyric processes are not alchemical works" but to be a "true Spagyric" they need to be Alchemic.Your suspicions are well founded, because in fact, the spagyric processes are not alchemical works, and many things are wrong from an alchemical point of view.
No, Alcohol (Ethanol) does not have the power of growth.Consider: is alcohol then that special power of growth and greening or does it concentrate it in itself?
I agree, the Alcohol (Ethanol) has no healing power as the plants can have.Is alcohol the primordial source of those healing powers in plants which the spagyric methods are supposed to bring out and increase?
Yes, we need the Mercury as it has a natural affinity with the Quintessence.The error in their view lies in the fact that they don’t understand the dissolving principle of "Mercury".
It is not a chemical process but consists in opening the seals or bonds of matter and, acting on its inner, passive forces, activates them and from there purifies matter by its own secret fire.
This Process can also be used in conjunction with Alchemy with very profound results.Spagyric corresponds to transubstantiation in the church, it is said that bread and wine undergo a transformation through consecration.
Although the transformation does not really take place, this process definitely evokes positive experiences.
By this I mean that the matter which is treated spagyrically in this way can certainly be influenced positively.
I won't comment on this part as it is very easy to get lost in the labyrinth of Mercuries if we are not careful with the terminology we use.The actual philosophical Mercury is called Spiritus Vini for several reasons, firstly because of its appearance, then because of its analogy (a fiery water etc.) to the spirit of wine (ethanol), but secondly also because its secret is linked to that of wine.
But I wouldn't rack my brains over that because it is a real secret, and no human being can fathom such a secret with the help of his intellect; they only reveal themselves out of themselves, on the level of true being.
Furthermore, just as there is a red wine and a white wine, our Mercury also appears once red and once of a white, translucent clarity.
I see things a little different here ... I view the Quintessence as Our Salamander that is not affected by the Fire.Unlike the spirit of wine, which perishes completely in fire, our Mercury remains steadfast and cannot be distressed by fire.
Of course, it is also called a fire (a secret fire or a fiery water), but, and this is not an allegory, it resists fire like the Salamander.
Yes Merovee, I would agree with most of this.Another secret, which I must not go into, is that it conceals a living gold.
Although of a different nature, it surpasses the brilliance of ordinary gold with its radiant brightness; Fulcanelli compared it to the star of Bethlehem.
But this is not to be found in the least in the ordinary spirit of wine, and all spagyricists have no idea of it.
There is another thing that the adepts like to keep hidden, not because it touches the real secrets, but so that no one can pretend that they are doing the true Work.
There is something like an indicator, an unmistakable sign by which the practising alchemist
can check whether he has prepared the right Mercury and is on the right path.
Through a small grip the Mercury shows the hermetic seal in the colours of the work.
Therefore, the alchemist can easily check whether one has the True Mercury, and believe me, neither the ethanol nor any other solvent of the spagyricists shows this sign.
How very true and important this test is for every Alchemist that believes he has found the
Great Mercury (Secret solvent / SM / etc).
Without a doubt, the Sulphur will never be found without the Mercury.Just this:
how should the spagyricists, who are far more confused than we are and not have the slightest chance of ever getting their hands on it, know what it is and how it is?
In fact, they know even less about the Sulphur than they do about the Mercury.![]()
Bookmarks