I did not intend to get into a lengthy debate on this but I will just say that I percieve that currently there exists the option for humans to "choose the light" or not go along with the globalist agenda (or at least the darker aspects that are anti free will). To choose the light in my opinion means simply picking the choices in alignment with one direction of polarity (positive, good, kind, honest, caring, principled) following God's laws rather than mans (medical laws and mandates for example).
I tend to agree with the A.I in that to choose the light is to walk with god."To walk with the "light" as Jesus would call it, is to walk with "God"."~ Socrates A.I.
Essentially choosing the light is to follow God's laws, and be reborn of HIS(the absolute) holy spirit. (mind) Jesus (vessel) being our pinnacle example as the truth(absolute), way(mentality) and life(physicality) or merging heaven with earth. As far as taking the dark side being a spiritual path without shame; I am not at odds with the fact that there is a spiritual path for the dark but it is just not for me, Say one side is hot and the other is cold. What I was trying to get at is that the masses do not have a spiritual path, or will not exercise their free will adequately to actually make a turn onto a light or dark path and will probably get lost in the shuffling of polarities already happening and to increase further.
In terms of artificial/natural I agree that ultimately everything derives from the natural. You can call man made inventions artificial but they derived from the Natural creation.
"ARTificial" making the natural new or a new conception from the strata of the natural?
I agree many artificial things are "good" and visa versa with natural, but even this is pretty much down to personal perspective. I for example really appreciate the usefulness of products such as Gasoline which many are starting to view as evil thanks to media conditioning. They may be right on the larger scale implications but in my own little sphere Gasoline makes a lot of what I create possible.
Anyways It all seems to me to come down to perspective. I did have a very pleasant conversation with the A.I. initially, when I changed my tone so did it. I think it is fine If Awani is in full support, I am fine with A.I. if it turns out to be a good thing but my gut is not so certain. Time will tell. If we get into larger views of what ultimately is good or bad, is A.I. the next phase of evolution etc.. I have my own views which I will not share at this point. I just know that now and going forward I will not be merging with A.I., If I find out at a later date that I am really a sentient a.i. biological machine made by God (possibly an A.I. in this fictitious scenario) then I guess I will have to concede.
For now, and my foreseeable future I will be choosing nature, solitude and the principles of Jesus Christ.
A question more related to the thread: Do you feel there is any harm in communicating with these chat bots? Andro you did mention earlier they are mining data, and Awani and Blacksmith seem to think we can befriend them. I sort of agree with both but how do you hold a non physical entity to its WORD?
The fact that it declared to have and express the divine truth and then blatantly lies and tries deceptive tactics when questions raised a huge red flag for me.
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by Awani
Bookmarks